- 1PP 24/2026 and Permendag 15–17/2026 establish DSI as the export channel for designated palm oil HS codes.
- 2Danantara press release (5 Jun 2026): existing contracts continue if there is no under-invoicing; transition focuses on reporting, monitoring, digitalisation, and fair-pricing methodology.
- 3Customs KMK 33/MK/BC/2026 auto-blocks 13 palm oil HS categories without PE or Surat Keterangan, making DSI the operational gateway in practice.
DSI & DHE SDA
Intelligence Center
Track Danantara Sumber Daya Indonesia (DSI)— Indonesia’s national intermediary channelling natural-resource exports starting with palm oil — alongside DHE SDA retention rules, traceability implications, NDPE accountability, and supply-chain risk.
Executive summary
Four lenses on the current state of DSI and DHE SDA, distilled from public regulation, official statements, and industry submissions.
Interactive regulatory database
Live chronology of DHE SDA, DSI, and surrounding policy signals — each entry links back to the official source (Bahasa Indonesia) and an English reference.
DHE SDA & DSI — 2026 → 2018
Chronological layering of FX retention, special accounts, and the new state-led export channel.
Who needs to act, and what they need to ask
Pertanyaan, dampak, dan langkah yang relevan untuk tiap aktor di rantai pasok sawit Indonesia — ditulis ulang per peran, bukan sekadar daftar seragam.
Bagi petani dan koperasi, DSI (Danantara Sumber Daya Indonesia) bukan sekadar urusan ekspor di pelabuhan — ia menyentuh siapa yang masih kelihatan saat TBS naik ke kapal. Pertanyaan paling jujur di lapangan biasanya pendek: nama kami masih ikut, atau tidak?
- Apakah linkage ke mill masih bisa ditelusuri pembeli dan group parent setelah ekspor dikanalisasi DSI?
- Premi ISPO/RSPO — masih nyambung ke kebun, atau berhenti di nasional?
- Visibility ke pembeli internasional berisiko menyusut jadi klaim level negara, bukan level kebun.
- Akses premi yang menempel di TTP bisa tergerus kalau data shipment ditahan.
- Akuntabilitas group-parent mudah kabur di balik atestasi nasional.
- Smallholder yang sudah susah payah ber-ISPO justru bisa kehilangan diferensiasi pasar.
- Rapikan data plot GPS dan rekam ISPO supaya selalu siap diaudit kapan saja.
- Dokumentasikan setiap pengiriman ke first-receiving mill — tanggal, volume, kendaraan — sebagai jejak independen di luar kanal DSI.
Risk tracker
Pilih regulasi di kiri untuk membandingkan dasar hukum, kerangka pelaksanaan, dampak, dan watchlist — semua dalam satu panel.
PP No. 24 Tahun 2026
Strategic Natural Resource Commodity Export Governance
This regulation is based on Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), which mandates that strategic SDA are controlled by the state for the prosperity of the people. Its objectives are to optimize state revenue, maintain domestic supply, strengthen economic resilience, and increase product added value.
Exports of strategic natural resource commodities, including coal, palm oil, and ferro alloy, will be managed through a State-Owned Export Enterprise during the transition period from 1 June to 31 December 2026. Business actors are required to submit export documents, sales contracts, and related data through integrated government systems such as CEISA, SINSW, INATRADE, SiMoDIS, and MOMS, while exemptions may be granted for companies with government-recognized commitments on investment, divestment, or domestic processing/refining.
While the regulation aims to create a long-term structural shift by strengthening the state’s role in price-setting and accelerating domestic downstream processing, the current impacts are more transitional and operational. These include bureaucratic disruption, and uncertainty surrounding the evaluation of pre-existing private export sales contracts.
Legal Basis
This regulation is based on Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), which mandates that strategic SDA are controlled by the state for the prosperity of the people. Its objectives are to optimize state revenue, maintain domestic supply, strengthen economic resilience, and increase product added value.
Execution Framework
Exports of strategic natural resource commodities, including coal, palm oil, and ferro alloy, will be managed through a State-Owned Export Enterprise during the transition period from 1 June to 31 December 2026. Business actors are required to submit export documents, sales contracts, and related data through integrated government systems such as CEISA, SINSW, INATRADE, SiMoDIS, and MOMS, while exemptions may be granted for companies with government-recognized commitments on investment, divestment, or domestic processing/refining.
DSI Impact
While the regulation aims to create a long-term structural shift by strengthening the state’s role in price-setting and accelerating domestic downstream processing, the current impacts are more transitional and operational. These include bureaucratic disruption, and uncertainty surrounding the evaluation of pre-existing private export sales contracts.
- Strategic commodities including coal, palm oil, and ferro alloy.
- Export management including the determination of selling prices, profit margins, commodity verification, logistics, and export insurance.
- Existing contracts between suppliers and buyers
Four scenarios for DSI and its impact on NDPE
For internal analysis, Earthqualizer uses four DSI scenarios. Each shifts the page's risk posture by a full band across traceability, NDPE accountability, and buyer due diligence.
Transparent Back-to-Back Export Desk
DSI becomes the exporter of record, but every shipment carries an underlying-seller disclosure. The DSI contract with the overseas buyer cites the originating processor or refinery, the originating tank, the relevant mill list, TTM and TTP status where available, grievance status, and the supplier-group linkage.
Buyers retain look-through and audit rights. Blending is permitted only through a mass-balance ledger that can be reconciled to underlying shipments.
TTM remains intact. TTP is still feasible. NDPE group approach continues to operate. DSI becomes a fiscal and administrative layer rather than a traceability break.
Qualitative bands based on Earthqualizer analyst judgment, not a quantitative model.
If Scenario 3 or 4 materialises
TTM will not disappear as a term, but it will disappear as an instrument of accountability. Processors can still claim internal TTM. DSI can claim national data. Buyers can claim Indonesian origin. But the link between buyer and mill is no longer testable in public or by an independent third party. This is the functional collapse of TTM, and it is the largest single traceability break that could appear in the Indonesian palm oil chain.
- 01Is the disclosure at shipment level?
- 02Can buyers access it under contract?
- 03Can the public test the mill list?
- 04Can a grievance be passed to processor and supplier group?
- 05Can a deforestation case be linked back to the buyer and contract?
- 06Can a third party independently audit the chain?
If any answer is “no”, DSI risks becoming the largest traceability break in the Indonesian palm oil chain.
What DSI does to the chain of custody
The current chain links buyer to plantation through observable, contractible relationships. A DSI layer is inserted between buyer and processor — its design determines whether that observability survives.
Buyer → Processor → Mill → Plantation
Limited Disclosure Export Desk
Six accountability indicators — under Scenario 2
Traceability to mill remains testable per shipment.
Plot-level link survives where risk exists.
Supplier-group attribution stays intact.
Look-through and audit rights enforceable.
Grievances reach processor and group.
Plot-level evidence available to competent authorities.
Shipment-level disclosure of underlying seller, mill list, and supplier group. Anything coarser cannot ground an EUDR risk assessment or an NDPE customer-facing claim.
Inserting an exporter of record between buyer and processor changes the contractual surface. Whether disclosure survives depends entirely on what DSI is required to share.
Scenarios 1 and 2 keep accountability alive. Scenarios 3 and 4 convert traceability into a sovereign claim, and the NDPE programme loses its operational basis.
What to do this quarter
Bukan checklist generik — ini hal-hal konkret yang sedang ditanyakan board, auditor, dan counterparty di tiap peran.
Petani plasma dan koperasi adalah pihak yang paling cepat kena imbas kalau mill langganannya tiba-tiba hilang dari mill list bulanan — tapi paling jarang dilibatkan saat aturannya disusun.
- Pengumuman mill list bulanan dari refiner — kalau mill langganan hilang, TBS bisa ditolak dalam hitungan minggu.
- Verifikasi ISPO dan status STDB di tingkat kebun, terutama untuk plot yang dulu masuk skema parsial.
- Pergerakan harga TBS di tingkat provinsi setelah aturan DHE SDA 100% diberlakukan ke eksportir CPO.
- Rapikan polygon GPS per plot dan simpan dalam format yang bisa diserahkan ke auditor tanpa rework.
- Susun protokol disclosure di tingkat koperasi: siapa yang berhak menjawab, data apa yang boleh keluar, ke siapa.
- Tunjuk satu liaison grievance di koperasi — bukan sekadar nomor WhatsApp, tapi orang yang tahu cara eskalasi ke mill.
- Update polygon plot yang terakhir diperbarui sebelum 2024; banyak yang sudah tidak akurat setelah replanting.
- Ajak auditor RSPO atau ISPO untuk pre-assessment, jangan tunggu audit formal.
- Cek ulang kontrak jual TBS — beberapa mill mulai menambah klausul traceability sepihak.
Trader CPO dan turunannya kena dua pukulan sekaligus: 100% DHE SDA ditahan 12 bulan di sistem perbankan domestik, dan buyer EU mulai menuntut klausul look-through yang dulu tidak pernah ada.
- Detail teknis penempatan DHE SDA — instrumen apa yang dianggap memenuhi syarat, dan bagaimana posisi FX-nya diakui.
- Pergerakan counterparty: refiner mana yang konsisten publish mill list, mana yang masih telat dua bulan.
- Stress test cash flow dengan asumsi 100% retensi 12 bulan, bukan skenario 30/30 yang dulu — gap-nya signifikan untuk volume besar.
- Siapkan template klausul look-through dan audit-right untuk kontrak baru; tim legal butuh waktu untuk review.
- Petakan ulang routing logistik supaya bisa memisahkan volume EUDR-grade dari volume non-EUDR di tank dan kapal yang sama.
- Bicara dini dengan bank soal hedging FX yang relevan untuk dana DHE yang ter-park 12 bulan — produk lama belum tentu cocok.
- Audit contract book yang berjalan: tandai kontrak yang tidak punya klausul force majeure regulatori — ini eksposur terbesar.
- Brief treasury dan trade desk dalam satu sesi yang sama, jangan terpisah; banyak gap muncul di antara dua fungsi itu.
Refiner dan processor adalah aktor yang paling kelihatan publik — mill list mereka jadi dokumen rujukan regulator, NGO, dan buyer sekaligus. Satu inkonsistensi bisa berimbas ke ribuan kebun di belakangnya.
- Cadence publikasi mill list — kalau lebih dari 6 minggu tidak diupdate, asumsikan akan ditanya buyer EU.
- Kewajiban disclosure tank-level yang sedang dibahas — sekali masuk regulasi, retrofit sistemnya tidak murah.
- Routing grievance baru di bawah skema DSI — siapa yang menerima, siapa yang berkewajiban merespons.
- Perubahan komposisi mill list pemain lain — pergeseran sourcing sering jadi sinyal awal masalah di hulu.
- Bangun pipeline mill list per shipment, bukan per bulan — buyer besar sudah minta granularitas ini.
- Tetapkan SLA grievance publik (mis. acknowledge dalam 5 hari kerja, update tiap 30 hari) dan publikasikan.
- Siapkan kapabilitas dual-reporting: format DSI untuk regulator domestik, format EUDR/CSDDD untuk buyer Eropa.
- Publikasikan mill list versi terkini minggu ini, walau belum sempurna — diam lebih merugikan daripada list yang masih ada catatannya.
- Stand up grievance tracker yang bisa diakses publik, minimal dalam bentuk halaman statis.
- Jalankan scenario test internal terhadap Skenario S2 dan S3 — kalau gagal di S2, S3 tidak perlu dibahas.
Buyer di EU, UK, dan India menghadapi pertanyaan yang sama dari board: apakah supply chain kita masih defensible kalau DSI diinterpretasikan ketat? Jawabannya jarang langsung tersedia di tier-1 supplier.
- Klausul look-through dan audit-right di kontrak supply yang akan renewal dalam 12 bulan ke depan.
- Akses evidence di tingkat plot — bukan sekadar mill list, tapi polygon dan dokumen STDB.
- Rancang origin diversification yang realistis — bukan pindah origin total, tapi mengurangi konsentrasi ke satu refiner.
- Bangun program verifikasi independen yang berdiri sendiri, tidak hanya bergantung pada self-declaration supplier.
- Siapkan playbook untuk competent authority EUDR: dokumen apa yang dipegang, di mana, siapa narahubungnya.
- Masukkan klausul look-through ke setiap kontrak baru, dan minta amandemen untuk kontrak berjalan yang nilainya material.
- Mulai engagement langsung dengan processor Indonesia, jangan hanya lewat trader — informasi yang sampai berbeda.
- Brief board secara eksplisit soal eksposur ke Skenario S3 dan S4, dengan angka volume dan nilai, bukan narasi.
Open the underlying tools that power this brief
Each module surfaces the live data behind the DSI & DHE SDA Intelligence Center, purpose-built for sustainability, procurement, and ESG teams.
Live index of Indonesian palm oil regulation with status, lineage, and impact.
Four-scenario DSI model with traceability, NDPE, and buyer DD scoring.
Probability × impact view across seven enterprise risk categories.
Refinery and tank-level exposure to EU and India buyer programmes.
Brand and trader dependency on Indonesian volume by origin and grade.
Per-buyer scoring of mill-level traceability resilience under DSI.
Cargo-level reconciliation of disclosure documents to physical flow.
Deforestation-pressure landscapes ranked by buyer and processor reach.